August 24, 2011
springwise:

 
In Spain, design your own clothing via 3D simulator
Design-your-own initiatives have regularly featured on Springwise over the years, and recently we came upon another interesting example. Set in Spain, Crearmoda allows users to design their own clothing and then offer up those designs for voting and incorporation by others. READ MORE…

springwise:

In Spain, design your own clothing via 3D simulator

Design-your-own initiatives have regularly featured on Springwise over the years, and recently we came upon another interesting example. Set in Spain, Crearmoda allows users to design their own clothing and then offer up those designs for voting and incorporation by others. READ MORE…

August 19, 2011
springwise:

 
Personalized coffee blends, shipped weekly to the door
The combination of personalization and home delivery is an irresistible one in virtually any product category, and coffee is no exception. Aiming to provide java lovers with an alternative to the mass-market brands that dominate most supermarket shelves, EightPointNine is a UK company that lets consumers create their own custom blends and then have them shipped each week directly to their door. READ MORE…

springwise:

 

Personalized coffee blends, shipped weekly to the door

The combination of personalization and home delivery is an irresistible one in virtually any product category, and coffee is no exception. Aiming to provide java lovers with an alternative to the mass-market brands that dominate most supermarket shelves, EightPointNine is a UK company that lets consumers create their own custom blends and then have them shipped each week directly to their door. READ MORE…

September 15, 2010
bnet: Are You Ready for Mass Customization? Answer These Five Questions From a CEO Who Knows

I wrote an article for BNet on Mass Customization! 

It includes five things you should consider before setting up shop:

1) Have you defined your solution space?

I’d like to credit Prof. Piller at this place btw - somehow quoting an academic is a complicated thing. 

2) Will you have your own production facility or outsource?

3) Do you know the appropriate price levels for your product?

4) Have you explored alternative ways to market your product?

5) Do you have a plan for scaling the business?

Enjoy the article

June 1, 2010
Article Translation and Summary: Mass Customization Seems to Become Nearly “Normal” in Germany

Funny enough,  after I just recently posted my article about why mass customization is so much bigger in Germany than in the US, a German online magazine went so far as to describe mass customization nearly normal in Germany today. Here a quick summary/ translation of the article:

The article begins by saying that in order to remain competitive, businesses have to make their customers’ dreams come true. While mass customization has been the exception in recent years, “it now seems to become fit for the masses”. “Personalized products have great potential, are becoming ever more popular with customers, and increasingly startups cover niches with it”

Examples: It then mentions Woonio (online configuration of furniture) as an example for an extraordinary application of mass customization, and states that mass customization in food seems to be really taking off (mentioning, not surprisingly, chocri, since we just tripled capacity with our recent move).

The article then quotes Prof. Piller (whose blog you should read too, by the way), who gives the example of Harry Potter as a very successful mass product, saying that there will always be successful mass products. Prof. Piller also mentions the complexity and costs in e.g. apparel and fashion companies that design clothing that they can not be sure that their consumers actually want them. Later in the article, Prof. Piller is quoted again, arguing that loyalty is increased when consumers design their own product online, due to higher switching costs once the perfect configuration is found.

In an outlook to the future, the author Susan Roenisch makes four major points:

1) 3D printing will become ever more powerful as it becomes cheaper

2) Mass Customization is Web 3.0 - instead of just interacting with customers, companies now integrate their customers into product development and production

3) Mass Customization is still a Long Tail matter - there will be room for mass as well as customized products

4) The limit of Mass Customization is to a large degree production scalability , which is caused by the fact that mostly small companies are successful in the space, but also enabled by the fact that small companies have more flexibility in their production

May 28, 2010
Why Is Mass Customization So Much Bigger In Germany?

In my recent presentation at the Smart Customization Seminar I made the point that Mass Customization is much bigger in Germany by showing the following image, comparing the number of mass customization companies in Germany vs those I could find in the US:

Note that I even included Burger King in the list of U.S. mass customizers because they advertise as “have it your way”, which is a stretch of the definition of a mass customizer.

Two observations can be made by looking at this list:

a) There are a lot more mass customizers in Germany than in the US!

b) Among the mass customizers in the U.S. are more large companies - like Nike, Dell, and M&Ms

This was underscored by the fact that it seemed that at the conference half of the attendees were German, and that in a benchmark analysis of 500 (as many as are known) mass customizers (RWW), 34% had a .de domain (which is only a portion of all German mass customizers).

So why is mass customization so much bigger in Germany? Here are two potential reasons as to why:

1) In European countries, there’s just less “mass” (production)
“Everything is bigger in America”. The Americans were the first ones to master mass production - think Ford and the T-Model, and a product mass produced for/ in the US has a much larger scale than say in Germany because it serves a market of 300 million, not 80 million people. Hence, consumers in the US are used to big brands and standardization across 50 states. In Europe, that is not the case. What you see in a German supermarket is likely to be very different from say an Italian supermarket. I believe that that probably primes Europeans to be more likely to adopt unique, mass customized products that are not all exactly the same.

2) The funding environment for startups
The drivers of mass customization in Germany are startups. Tiny startups, mostly founded by Generation Y entrepreneurs. The European marketplace of investors and ventures to invest in is much smaller and not as efficient as the one in the US, which requires many of these young entrepreneurs to start a business that they can self-fund with little capital. Mass Customization does that - it requires little investment because you can start with customization on a small scale, and it is cash flow friendly

Finally, it is a fact that some trends just get started outside of the US - like the “green movement” that is bringing quite a European behavior to the United States. Maybe in a similar way, mass customization is now coming to the US? As to why it started out in Germany in the first place - I’m sure there are other reasons but the two mentioned above, and I’m eager to hear your thoughts on it. 

May 13, 2010
Why You Should Mass Customize and Co-Create

The benefits and costs of being a mass customizer

Disadvantages of Mass Customization:

  • Higher production costs due to lack of automation and due to higher complexity (present in many startups though)
  • Longer delivery times decrease the value for the customer
  • Technology investment required for interaction/ configuration systems (thank you Internet, thank you social media)
  • Seasonality effect if the product is popular as a gift
  • Higher complexity for the customer (our customers tell us it’s fun though)

Advantages of Mass Customization:

  • The product is better because it’s made according to individual specifications of each customer. More value is created.
  • Less risk in product development due to co-creation and higher flexibility
  • Less waste, which is better for the environment
  • On-demand production leads to cashflow before product is even made
  • Customer loyalty is higher
  • Lower inventory cost (no post-production inventory)
  • Data from consumer configurations
  • As with every trend, this is the time to benefit from PR and the conversation that’s happening around Mass Customization and Co-Creation

***

p.s. Huge thanks to Sandra Haberler, a student who wrote a paper on Mass Customization and was so kind to share it with me. Parts of what I write above builds on what she found out in focus groups and expert interviews.

May 13, 2010
Why Small Firms Have An Advantage

This was originally posted on the chocri blog in December 2009.

A while ago, I noticed that there are a lot of success stories about startups taking on the adventure of mass customization, but that some of the big companies ceased their mass customization efforts.

Levi’s used to offer custom jeans - no more.

Land’s End allowed you to design your own clothing - merely dress shirts are offered tucked away into a corner of their website.


General Mills still owns the domain mycereal.com - yet it only redirects you to their corporate homepage. What happened?

I decided to ask an authority on the subject - Professor Frank Piller (also see his blog on mass customization here).

He was so kind to send me a paper from 2005^, where he discusses exactly what I’ve been wondering about. Below my summary of his take on why big firms have a disadvantage at mass customization:

Basically, Prof. Piller states that firms have to do two things in order to enable mass customization:

  • A: Companies have to achieve flexibility in their production of goods
  • B: Companies have to create an interaction system to learn about the preferences of their customers

Many big companies benefit from immense scale, and it is challenging to allow mass production to churn out billions of different products in addition to the ongoing mass business. This requires change management capabilities and an agreement throughout the organization that few big companies can achieve - it is a lot riskier than betting on another mass product!

When was the last time you engaged in a real dialogue with a mass producer? These companies have too many customers to start a real interaction process. I believe that in order to allow your customers to co-design a product, you need to (1) understand their general preferences to determine which modules you offer as customization options, and (2) you need to provide a toolkit to let your customers customize your product. Many big companies are not used to being this close to their customer without a market research firm or an advertising agency in between. Again, small and agile startups in their respective niches have an advantage.

It seems to me that social media might be a remedy to this problem. Also, we shouldn’t ignore that there are success stories, such as NikeID!

What do you think - do startups have an advantage in the mass customization arena?

^ Frank Piller (2005): “Mass Customization: Reflections on the State of the Concept”, The International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems, 16, 313–334

March 9, 2010

Danny from Blank Label (custom men’s dress shirts) on the company and the shirt he’s wearing. P.S. Here’s the digital dress shirt design app he talks about.

January 25, 2010
Why Small Firms Have An Advantage

A while ago, I noticed that there are a lot of success stories about startups taking on the adventure of mass customization, but that some of the big companies ceased their mass customization efforts.

Levi’s used to offer custom jeans - no more.
Land’s End allowed you to design your own clothing - merely dress shirts are offered tucked away into a corner of their website.
General Mills still owns the domain mycereal.com - yet it only redirects you to their corporate homepage. What happened?

I decided to ask an authority on the subject - Professor Frank Piller (also see his blog on mass customization here).

He was so kind to send me a paper from 2005^, where he discusses exactly what I’ve been wondering about. Below my summary of his take on why big firms have a disadvantage at mass customization:

Basically, Prof. Piller states that firms have to do two things in order to enable mass customization:

  • A: Companies have to achieve flexibility in their production of goods
  • B: Companies have to create an interaction system to learn about the preferences of their customers

Many big companies benefit from immense scale, and it is challenging to allow mass production to churn out billions of different products in addition to the ongoing mass business. This requires change management capabilities and an agreement throughout the organization that few big companies can achieve - it is a lot riskier than betting on another mass product!

When was the last time you engaged in a real dialogue with a mass producer? These companies have too many customers to start a real interaction process. I believe that in order to allow your customers to co-design a product, you need to (1) understand their general preferences to determine which modules you offer as customization options, and (2) you need to provide a toolkit to let your customers customize your product. Many big companies are not used to being this close to their customer without a market research firm or an advertising agency in between. Again, small and agile startups in their respective niches have an advantage.

It seems to me that social media might be a remedy to this problem. Also, we shouldn’t ignore that there are success stories, such as NikeID!

What do you think - do startups have an advantage in the mass customization arena?

^ Frank Piller (2005): “Mass Customization: Reflections on the State of the Concept”, The International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems, 16, 313–334

Liked posts on Tumblr: More liked posts »